Ministry of Labour: Gender Wage Gap Consultation – Closing the Gender Wage Gap
The Human Resources Professionals Association has publically released its findings of our policy paper "Closing the Gender Wage Gap”, a review and recommendations looks at multiple factors, often the result of unconscious biases, that are associated with the gender wage gap at various stages of a woman’s life, from childhood education to the workplace.
The report makes 20 recommendations in total, including:
- Expand government training on pay equity issues and solutions—similar to the mandatory Supervisor Awareness Training the Ministry of Labour requires for the Occupational Health and Safety Act.
- Develop a pilot program to combat negative stereotypes by exposing young women to positive female role models from the STEM sectors.
- Implement provincial labour market research to project demand for skills both in the near and distant futures.
The report argues that by taking these concrete steps, real progress can be made towards closing the wage gap between men and women.
The full report can be found HERE.
2016 HRPA Submission on Bill 132 – Sexual Violence and Harassment Action Plan Act (Supporting Survivors and Challenging Sexual Violence and Harassment), 2016
The HRPA made a presentation to the Standing Committee on Social Policy offer our full support for this bill and expanding what constitutes “Workplace Harassment” to Include Sexual Harassment to ensure the safety of workers in the workplace.
The committee members were also asked to amended the act in its current form or add the regulations provide an approved list that identifies individuals qualified to act on section 55.3(1).
HRPA recommended that blanket phrase stating designated members of the association who conduct third-party workplace investigations be put on an approved list
Please click here to read the presentation.
2015 Ministry of Labour Consultation: The Changing Workplaces Review
The Human Resources Professionals Association has publically released its findings of our policy paper "A New Deal for Ontario’s Changing Workplaces”.
In this paper, HRPA asserts that the time has come for the government to establish a “new deal” for Ontario employers and workers. To contextualize the issues and provide meaningful solutions, this paper uses multiple research methods including a survey of our members, a series of interviews with high-level HR professionals from a range of sectors, as well as, an investigation into what other jurisdictions are doing with their own employment standards.
This paper contains 30 different recommendations that would establish a new deal for Ontario businesses and workers. These are grouped in five different areas for change:
• Reforms to help Ontario businesses compete in a global economy;
• Reforms to help employees by providing flexibility and a better work-life balance;
• Reforms to help protect vulnerable workers;
• Ideas on how the Ministry of Labour can help improve compliance; and,
• Concerns around expanding employee representation to new forms such as Worker Councils.
Base on the findings of its research, we argue the time has come for Ontario to establish a “new deal” for its employers and workers. By updating the ESA and LRA, the province will make Ontario a more competitive and profitable jurisdiction for businesses to operate in, and workers will be happier and healthier by achieving a better work-life balance.
Please click here to read the full paper.
2015 ORPP Consultation Submission - Bill-56: An Act to require the establishment of the Ontario Retirement Pension Plan.
The HRPA surveyed members to gauge their opinion of the proposed “Ontario Retirement Pension Plan (ORPP). Based on the limited information the government provided about the plan, 53% of HRPA members surveyed were against the proposed plan. Now that the government has introduced Bill 56, Ontario Retirement Pension Plan Act, 2014, the public has more details about the ORPP. HRPA again surveyed its members on the ORPP based on the new information provided. Based on the survey results, HRPA made a presentation to the Standing Committee Social Policy.
Please click here to read the presentation.
2015 HRPA Submission - Tony Dean Review on Ontario Colleges and Trades
The Government of Ontario appointed former Secretary of Cabinet and head of the Ontario Public Service, Tony Dean, to review key areas of Ontario’s skilled trades system within the mandate of the Ontario College of Trades. The HRPA made a submission to the review in March.
Please click here to read the report.
Bill 14- Access to Justice Act
On May 1st, 2007, the Law Society became responsible for regulating the paralegal profession in Ontario, as a result of amendments to the Law Society Act (“Act”) contained in Bill 14, Access to Justice Act. Under provisions in the Act, some activities currently done by HR Professionals may be seen as providing legal services and thus would be subject to the Law Society’s regulative, investigative, and disciplinary authority as part of the new paralegals licensing regime.
The Act states that, “a person provides legal services if the person engages in conduct that involves the application of legal principles and legal judgment with regard to the circumstances or objectives of a person.”
Examples given in the Act of providing legal service are when a person,
- Gives a person advice with respect to the legal interests, rights or responsibilities of the person of another person.
- Selects, drafts, completes or revises, on behalf of a person, a document that affects a person’s interests in or rights to or in real or personal property
- Represents a person in a proceeding before an adjudicative body
- Negotiates the legal interests, rights or responsibilities of a person.
As a result of this definition, some HR practitioners may find that they engage in conduct now covered by the Act – if, for example, they handle employment contracts, terminations, benefits, pensions or represent clients at the Ontario Labour Relations Board, Human Rights Tribunal or deal with collective bargaining issues.
Under certain conditions, anyone in Ontario, engaged in such activities, could be require to be licensed as a paralegal. Among other requirements, according to Law Society’s guidelines, those individuals would need to pass a licensing exam and carry errors and omissions insurance.
However, there are exceptions to these requirements where an individual, based on the Act, is excluded from its licensing provision. According to the Act, the following groups and individuals are not subject to licensing under Bill 14:
- A person who is acting in the normal course of carrying on a profession or occupation governed by another Act of the Legislature, or an Act of Parliament, that regulates specifically the activities of persons engaged in that profession or occupation.
- An employee or officer of a corporation who selects, drafts, completes or revises a document for the use of the corporation or to which the corporation is a party.
- An individual who is acting on his or her own behalf, whether in relation to a document, a proceeding or otherwise.
- An employee or a volunteer representative of a trade union who is acting on behalf of the union or a member of the union in connection with a grievance, a labour negotiation, an arbitration proceeding or a proceeding before an administrative tribunal.
- A person or a member of a class or persons prescribed by the by-laws, in the circumstances prescribed by the by-laws.
It is HRPA’s position that since HRPA and its members are governed pursuant to the Human Resources Professionals Act of Ontario, 1990, an Act of the Ontario Legislature, which regulates the HR professionals in Ontario, its members are not subject by the Act. To meet this exemption, you need to be a member of HRPA in good standing, complying with HRPA Code of Ethics and be acting in the normal course of activity of a HR Professional. If you are not a member of HRPA, or you are a member and are engaged in activities outside the normal course of our profession or occupation, you may be subject to an LSUC licensing regime.
HRPA has recently received correspondence from the Law Society advising us that they take a different view of the scope of the exemption set out in the Act. However, under their authority in the Act to create by-law exemptions, the Law Society has passed a provision for HRPA members, which would specifically exempt them from paralegal licensing under certain terms.
According to the Law Society’s by-law, HRPA members do not require a license if their profession or occupation is neither the provision of legal services nor the practice of law, if they provide legal services only occasionally and if they provide legal services as ancillary to their normal profession or occupation. The Law Society’s correspondence sets out, in greater detail, the conditions that they consider to be necessary for the exemption to apply. The Law Society has stated that it will review all their by-law exemptions within the next two years.
In our view, the Bill already exempts HRPA members, so this bylaw exemption is not necessary. However, while we do not agree with the Law Society's interpretation of the legislation, we felt it prudent to inform and alert our members to their position and the exemption they have offered. A copy of Law Society’s letters to HRPA along with HRPA response and Law Society’s by-law 4 dealing with licensing have been posted at the end of this note. We encourage you to review these documents.
As you can see, there are differing views how Bill 14 will affect HRPA members and human resources professionals more generally. Since Bill 14 has only recently come into force, its interpretation has not been considered by the Courts. Ultimately, it will be for them to decide.
If you feel that any of these provisions might apply to you, we strongly urge all HRPA members and non members, to find out more about the Law Society Act amendments and how they may affect your work duties and responsibilities.
HRPA will continue to keep our members informed as the matter evolves.
Click here to see a copy of the LSUC letter on the by-law exemption.
Click here to see a copy of the HRPA response to the LSUC letter.
Click here to see a copy of the LSUC response to HRPA letter.
Click here to see a copy of the LSUC By-laws 4. See section 30(1) paragraph 7.